top of page
Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act (S.C. 2000, c. 24) [Link]
World Economic Forum | mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines | Health Canada | Safe Spaces | Social Engineering
The Fourth Industrial Revolution
A Postmodern Approach to Social Sustainability
Supplemental to the Testimony page and as an information resource, the following seeks to underscore the pervasiveness and immediacy of the Fourth Industrial Revolution ("4IR") scandal as it relates to politics and the human person.
Re: Life 3.0 Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Tegmark, Max Vintage; Illustrated edition (July 31 2018) ISBN 1101970316
Transhumanism as the Dominant Ideology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Journal international de bioéthique et d'éthique des sciences Issue 3-4, 2018, pages 189 to 203
Translated and edited by Cadenza Academic Translations
Translator: Ruth Grant, Editor: Matt Burden, Senior editor: Mark Mellor
On the History and Potential of CRISPR and Gene Drive
Geoff Ralston, CEO, Y Combinator
Google cache date, July 9th, 2023
BNT162b2 mRNA (COVID-19) Vaccine
Canada's government website adopts an authoritative position regarding SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines such as Pfizer and Moderna. Recent studies by MIT and Lund University call the same confidence into question. What do their findings reveal?
Official Statement, Government of Canada
The Lund University mRNA Study
A prominent topic of the zersetzung group
Commentary on the Lund Study
Gov't of Canada Policy Horizons Statement
Commentary on the MIT Study
Commentary on the MIT Study (Lab vs. Live Subject)
Ivermectin and Covid-19
Reuters' critique of the MIT study was non-technical, biased, and at times glib. The result of the MIT study proposed that DNA alteration is likely probable. Notwithstanding, data from both studies contradict the Canadian Government's public assurance concerning nucleus entry.
Bottom Line
By way of credible research findings, the Government of Canada is not in position to make the claims it has concerning mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. While stopping short of definitive statements concerning genome DNA alteration, the scientific community has been clear that there are reasonable grounds to believe the same might be probable, and has called for further study. It must be asked why the Government of Canada, and governments the world over, have pushed experimental vaccination so strenuously on a swift execution timetable to address an ailment found to be no more deadly than the common flu. This concern is exacerbated when paired with the availability of Ivermectin, a cheap, safe drug which research has shown can consistently treat the ailment without any side-effects. Reason suggests Ivermectin would have been a safe, cheap, and responsible turn-key solution to the Covid outbreak. Disproportionate objections by the public sector and mainstream media toward dissenting voices and groups is also a compelling data point.
Journalistic Independence..
Per MIT and Lund Research, the Health Canada cannot substantiate its claims.
Public Health: Influence vs. Insight
Most people might agree it would make better sense for Health Canada to invest taxpayer money in credible research efforts concerning the contents and characteristics of the mRNA technology, which was pushed out to the public at lightning speed. Likewise, the Prime Minister's heavy-handed mandate concerning Public Servants and their choice between vaccination and continued income is of glaring concern. The following section contains research insights regarding the consistent presence of self-assembly nanoparticles in live blood samples (ie. here, here, and here).
Covid-19 Vaccine Dark-Field Microscopy
COVID-19 Vaccine Dark-Field Microscopy, Dr. David Nixon
November 13th, 2023
Reuters Should Fact-Check the Blood Samples, not the MD.
Ethics, Values, Culture, and Human Rights
Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects Citizens' beliefs and values within our rules-based social contract, but its litmus test concerns enforceability. At present, Citizens must conduct their own research to learn about 4IR and its immediate political implications, whereas media coverage is sporadic and biased. The articles linked on this website were compiled because circumstances occasioned their research. They paint a compelling picture most Citizens might find alarming. Moreover, they provide a framework for critical and necessary discussion. This page exists to demonstrate the immediacy of these issues, their scandal, their proximate relevance to everyday people, and their manner of public disclosure.
CRISPR Human Genome Editing: "Piece of Cake"
This article by Y-Combinator CEO Geoff Ralston and a host of collaborators was posted on the Y-Combinator website, and later removed in July 2023. Pictured is the cached version which is also archived on archive.org and archive.ph. In layperson's terms, the article is useful in outlining CRISPR genome editing and its ease of execution. The casual, if not cavalier tone Mr. Ralston uses in expressing this technology and its ability to change the "software of life" is unsettling. It expresses the merit in 4IR as expressed by proponents who envision it as a eugenics enablement tool. The UN/WEF has expressly stated 4IR technologies will be used to address social challenges, and has advised multistakeholder governance is required. Money and interest drive change, and the same change is codified in UN/WEF docs.
CRISPR Gene Drive
In the same article, Mr. Ralston underscores the immediacy of CRISPR editing as political hot button issue. CRISPR Gene Drive, as is outlined in numerous other publications, does have the ability to fundamentally change the human race as we know it. Furthermore, he opines that it may only be a matter of time before such means are leveraged by governments in the interest of social sustainability or otherwise. These opinions must be considered alongside the remainder of 4IR-related materials to properly distinguish between sensationalism, and a credible public issue.
"Politicans, Religious Leaders, and Ethicists"
While the idea of genome editing is controversial to some, the Fourth Industrial Revolution is a bombshell issue for people of various faiths. I cannot speak on behalf of any of these groups, but the article linked above is presented as an example. There are, by and large, significant population groups which could not accept a future envisioned by 4IR proponents, which is reasonably evidenced to include genome modification and invasive technologies, as is shown in both public sector and private sector publications. By means of the money and influence behind posthuman doctrines, and whereas contemporary culture is suffused with postmodern assumptions, the articles linked on this site provide a clarion call to politicians, religious leaders and ethicists who have an ability to address 4IR proactively. Because the issue is entirely divisive, it must be assumed, in accord with examples throughout human history, that supportive money and influence may decide to execute its vision unilaterally, in the interest of executing their vision for a sustainable world. Disparity in doctrinal positions does appear too diverse to prevent being deadlocked in dialogue. The remainder of content on this site supports this inference.
Political Undercurrents
"And it hath come to pass, at that time, I search Jerusalem with lights, And I have laid a charge on the men Who are hardened on their preserved things, Who are saying in their heart: Jehovah doth no good, nor doth He evil." - Zephaniah 1:12
bottom of page