As a companion to the February 7th, 2025 blog, this update exposes my more recent efforts to solicit RCMP support.  In October 2024, the RCMP professional standards unit pointed me toward the CRCC (The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission).  The CRCC correspondence is appended below an RCMP apology letter issued in its wake, by a decorated Superintendent.  My response letters to both are exhibited on this page, which respond to a palpable obstruction of justice on the part of the police regulator, as well as the RCMP itself. 

​

Immediately below, the RCMP admitted to denying a reasonable response in late 2021 / early 2022 in Surrey, British Columbia.  Their letter omits a significant portion of the criminal offences involved, and makes no offer to address the ongoing and evolving characteristics of the scandal.  The RCMP has not responded to subsequent follow-up.  As of the date of this blog post, I pursue an Appeal in the Federal Court of Canada in seeking an Order of Mandamus, and injunctive relief the SCC did not provide through its refusal to add the matter to its docket.  

​
Hill v. Hamilton‑Wentworth Regional Police Services Board, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 129, 2007 SCC 41 at paragraph 37;
‘As Peter Cory points out, at pp. 101 and 103: If the State commits significant errors in the course of the investigation and prosecution, it should accept the responsibility for the sad consequences. Society needs protection from both the deliberate and the careless acts of omission and commission which lead to wrongful conviction and prison.”